[spoiler]
Casavult wrote:Omega2058 wrote:The Z wrote:Due to the year long "lol, use PRO CFW" 'propaganda', this doesnt surprise me.
A CFW that happened to shift to being open source got more attention than the one that was closed, but that's just how things played out. Besides compatibility issues, both are good regardless of how the menus look.
I have to agree 100%.
The Z wrote:Recovery Menu (looks like ****, imo).
Unless you have forgotten, you do realise they both look the same? They are the same with the only difference of sorting of available options and colour (unless you make ME recovery red).
Where's the difference in looks? :lol:
[/spoiler]
Good job comparing a SUBMENU to the main menu, ***.
The PRO Recovery menu looks liks dogpoo, because it does not look exactly like the M33 one did.
I know this is getting a bit picky, but that is the only part of the PRO CFW the is completely and utterly garbage.
The missing functions of using the arrow keys (left/right) to navigate through the menus (recovery & vsh), and the recovery menu not being its own mode (just a darn overlay) are minor annoyances that are definitely picky, but the layout itself is the main problem.
And casavult, I never said you (directly) said I am a silly fanboy, but some other *** said that. I am not really a ME fanboy, per se, but a M33 fanboy, and if the CFW isnt exactly like M33 (of course new features are welcome), then it is ****.
Go ahead, laugh at my "pathetic" reasoning, but feel free to know my reasonings. And sorry to you SoulPleumz for invading your thread with this ****. Use whatever CFW you prefer, both are good, but yet ME/LME has the more "classical" recovery menu (which is, in my **** opinion better).